Bruce Momjian writes: > In looking at the VAX ASM problem, I realized that the ASM in s_lock.h > is all formatted differently, making it even more confusing. I have > applied the following patch to s_lock.h to try and clean it up. I don't believe in this patch at all. It makes the assumption that all assemblers have equally forgiving lexical rules as a certain subset of said assemblers. For example, the VAX code does not look at all like the one back when it still worked. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/peter-e/
- [HACKERS] s_lock.h cleanup Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] s_lock.h cleanup Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] s_lock.h cleanup Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cle... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_l... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_l... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cle... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.... Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup Bruce Momjian