> I have been studying DeadLockCheck for most of a day now, and I doubt
> that this is the only bug lurking in it. I think that we really ought
> to throw it away and start over, because it doesn't look to me at all
> like a standard deadlock-detection algorithm. The standard way of doing
Go ahead. Throw away my code. *sniff* :-)
No really, feel free to rip it out and start over. It caught most
cases, and I was glad it worked at all, seeing I had never done deadlock
detection before, nor read anything about it.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
