Oleg Bartunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I understand Tom's arguments and respect his experience, so I think it's > possible to put link to my page in 7.1 docs for people interested in > GiST features. Bear in mind that I only have one core vote ;-). We've already had some private core discussion about whether to accept this patch now, and so far I think I'm outvoted. Did I understand you to say that you'd added some regression tests for GiST? That would lessen my unhappiness a little bit ... regards, tom lane
- AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Hannu Krosing
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1... Hannu Krosing
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST fo... Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiS... Hannu Krosing
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re:... Oleg Bartunov
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST fo... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiS... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re:... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re:... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re:... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiS... Lamar Owen
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re:... Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiS... Tom Lane
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Mikheev, Vadim