Oleg Bartunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > we've almost totally rewrite gist.c because old code and algorithm > were not suitable for variable size keys. I think it might be > submitted into 7.1 beta source tree. Urgh. Dropping in a total rewrite when we're already past beta3 doesn't strike me as good project management practice --- especially if the rewrite was done to add features (ie variable-size keys) not merely fix bugs. I think it might be more prudent to hold this for 7.2. regards, tom lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer ... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer ... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer ... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer ... Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer ... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer ... Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer ... Hannu Krosing
- [HACKERS] GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Hannu Krosing
- [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] 7.1 features list Ryan Kirkpatrick
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] 7.1 features list Bruce Momjian