> > Well, it's not good idea because of SIGTERM is used for ABORT + EXIT > > (pg_ctl -m fast stop), but shouldn't ABORT clean up everything? > > Er, shouldn't ABORT leave the system in the exact state that it's > in so that one can get a crashdump/traceback on a wedged process > without it trying to clean up after itself? Sorry, I've meant "transaction abort"... Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] Quite strange cra... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Quite strange cra... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Quite strange cra... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Quite strange crash Denis Perchine
- Re: [HACKERS] Quite strange cra... Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] Quite strange crash Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] Quite strange crash Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] Quite strange crash Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] Quite strange crash Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Quite strange crash Alfred Perlstein
- RE: [HACKERS] Quite strange crash Vadim Mikheev
- RE: [HACKERS] Quite strange crash Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] Quite strange crash Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] Quite strange crash Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] Quite strange crash Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] Quite strange crash Mikheev, Vadim