Re: [HACKERS] Isn't init_irels() dangerous ?

[Hiroshi Inoue]

Tom Lane wrote: > > Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> OK. Second proposal: do the init_irels() call in > >> RelationCacheInitializePhase2(). I've just looked through the > >> other stuff that's done in between, and I don't think any of it > >> needs valid relcache entries. > > > Oops, I neglected to reply "agreed", sorry. > > It would be much safer for init_irels() to be called > > in a proper transaction than the current implementation. > > Fine. Were you going to do it, or do you want me to? > It would only need to change a few lines. OK, I will do it. Regards. Hiroshi Inoue