"Oliver Elphick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Smart Shutdown request at Thu Dec 28 02:41:49 2000 >> DEBUG: shutting down >> FATAL 2: Checkpoint lock is busy while data base is shutting down >> Shutdown failed - abort > It's not just on Alpha; I've seen that on my i386 Linux system. Oooh, that's interesting. I was just blindly assuming that it was a problem with the Alpha spinlock code (we've sure heard plenty of discussion of same). But maybe there's an actual logic bug in the checkpoint code. I don't see one in a quick scan though. FWIW, I do *not* see this behavior on HPUX. It seems perfectly reproducible on the Debian Alpha box. Is it reproducible on your i386 box, or only sometimes? Vadim, any ideas? regards, tom lane
- [HACKERS] Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha Brent Verner
- [HACKERS] Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on ... Brent Verner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1... Brent Verner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1... Brent Verner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1... Tom Lane
- Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alph... Tom Lane
- Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alph... Brent Verner
- Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alph... Oliver Elphick
- Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alph... Tom Lane
- Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alph... Oliver Elphick
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1... Brent Verner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha Brent Verner