Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Maybe a setting that controls the total number of files that postmaster
> plus backends can allocate among them would be useful.
That'd be nice if we could do it, but I don't see any inexpensive way
to get one backend to release an open FD when another one needs one.
So, divvying up the limit on an N-per-backend basis seems like the
most workable approach.
regards, tom lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinlock p... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinlock ... mlw
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinl... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Too many open files (was Re: s... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Too many open files (was R... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Too many open files (was R... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinl... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinl... Tatsuo Ishii
