On Sat, 23 Dec 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote: > OK, but does shipping our code with hooks obligate us? We don't ship > readline. Oh, oops. I didn't know readline wasn't in the postgres tree. Then, obviously, distribution of .tar.gz does not obligate postgres to anything, HOWEVER, the problem arises with distribution of binaries (.rpm and others) which are linked against libreadline _statically_ (basically, we can't do it). Our RPM distrib is linked dynamically, but I don't know about other binaries... >From my understanding of GPL, if it is linked dynamically, we are exempt since it does not constitute a 'derived package'. -alex
- [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Alex Pilosov
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Alex Pilosov
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Fabrice Scemama
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and... Tom Lane