"Michael Richards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The alignment seems to be wrong for type CHAR(1): No, the alignment is fine. A field's align constraint says where it has to start, not where the next field has to start. gender starts on a 4-byte boundary and is 5 bytes long, then we have one byte wasted for alignment of yearofbirth, then yearofbirth starts on a 2-byte boundary. Everyone's happy. regards, tom lane
- [HACKERS] More Tuple Madness Michael Richards
- Re: [HACKERS] More Tuple Madness Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] More Tuple Madness Michael Richards
- Re: [HACKERS] More Tuple Madness Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Attribute Alignment Michael Richards
- Re: [HACKERS] Attribute Alignment Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Attribute Alignment Michael Richards
- Re: [HACKERS] Attribute Alignment Ross J. Reedstrom