RE: [HACKERS] CRCs (was: beta testing version)

[Mikheev, Vadim]

> > That's why an end marker must follow all valid records.  
...
> 
> That requires an extra out-of-sequence write. 

Yes, and also increase probability to corrupt already committed
to log data.

> (I'd also like to see CRCs on all the table blocks as well; is there
> a place to put them?)

Do we need it? "physical log" feature suggested by Andreas will protect
us from non atomic data block writes.

Vadim