> Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Err, with Tom's objections, why was this applied?
> 
> > * Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001028 11:34]:
> >> Applied.   Thanks.
> 
> Itchy trigger finger today, Bruce?
> 
> Please revert the change --- I'm still discussing it with Kevin offlist,
> but I don't feel it's acceptable as-is because it breaks reasonable
> (non-redundant) UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT constructs that have worked for
> several releases past.

Backed out.  I applied it because you said "it was not unacceptible", so
I thought you liked it.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Reply via email to