[HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)

[Trond Eivind Glomsrød]

Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Unfortunately RPM deems a dependency upon libpq.so.2.0 to not be
> fulfilled by libpq.so.2.1 (how _can_ it know?  A client linked to 2.0
> might fail if 2.1 were to be loaded under it (hypothetically)).
> 
> Now, that doesn't directly effect the PostgreSQL RPM's.  What it does
> effect is the guy who wants to install PHP from  with PostgreSQL support
> enabled and cannot because of a failed dependency. Who gets blamed?
> PostgreSQL.
> 
> Trond may correct me on this, but I don't know of a workaround for
> this. 

There usually are no such problems, and I'm not aware of any specific
to postgresql either.
 

-- 
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.