> server, before we accept MSSQL, we use this method to test if MSSQL can endure this kind of strik, > it's OK, all databases are safely recovered, we can continue our work. we are a stock exchange company, And how exactly did you test the integrity of your data? Unless every single record has got at least a CRC stored somewhere, you won't be able AT ALL to check for database integrity. The reports from NTFS and MSSQL internal checking are meaningless for your data integrity. We are doing this checksumming in our project, and already got a few nasty surprises when the "CRC daemon" stumbled over a few corrupted records we never would have discovered otherwise. Exactly this checksumming weeded out our server alternatives; at present only PostgreSQL is left, was the most reliable of all. Horst
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version xuyifeng
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Mitch Vincent
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Ron Chmara
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Don Baccus
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version xuyifeng
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Horst Herb
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Alain Toussaint
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Don Baccus
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Mitch Vincent
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Don Baccus
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Vadim Mikheev
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Nathan Myers