At 12:03 AM 11/21/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >Peter has remarked that the SQL spec offers a set of system views >intended to provide exactly this info. That should be looked at; >if there's a workable standard for this stuff, we oughta follow it. This and a BUNCH else. - Don Baccus, Portland OR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.
- Re: [HACKERS] Table/Colu... Rod Taylor
- Re: [HACKERS] Table/Colu... Philip Warner
- RE: [HACKERS] Table/Colu... Christopher Kings-Lynne
- RE: [HACKERS] Table/Colu... Philip Warner
- RE: [HACKERS] Table/Colu... Christopher Kings-Lynne
- Re: [HACKERS] Table/Colu... Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] Table/Colu... Christopher Kings-Lynne
- Re: [HACKERS] Table/Colu... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Table/Colu... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Table/Colu... Karl DeBisschop
- RE: [HACKERS] Table/Colu... Don Baccus
- RE: [HACKERS] Table/Colu... Stephan Szabo
- Re: [HACKERS] Table/Colu... Don Baccus
- Re: [HACKERS] Table/Colu... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Table/Colu... Don Baccus
- Re: [HACKERS] Table/Column Constr... Bruce Momjian
- RE: [HACKERS] Table/Column Constraints Christopher Kings-Lynne
- Re: [HACKERS] Table/Column Constraints jmscott