Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> BTW, I thought you were backing out the unnecessary changes to the >> client applications? pg_dump seems not to be reverted yet, for one... > I thought I had. I don't see them here. Can you tell me what you see. My apologies. I must have been looking at the wrong file versions ... regards, tom lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting ... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hos... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL vir... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hos... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL vir... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Postg... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] P... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting ... David J. MacKenzie
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting ... David J. MacKenzie
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hos... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual... Ross J. Reedstrom