At 13:39 14/11/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >I've committed the template0/template1 changes we were discussing >earlier. Plain pg_dump and pg_dumpall are changed to behave properly, >but I didn't touch pg_backup or pg_restore; can you deal with those? I still think that pg_dump needs to use the lastoid in template0 - did you fail to implement this because you disagree, or because you think it should use the current db lastsysoid? ---------------------------------------------------------------- Philip Warner | __---_____ Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \ (A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_ Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \ Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ | Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \| | --________-- PGP key available upon request, | / and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
- [HACKERS] Details for planned template0/template1 change Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Details for planned template0/template1 c... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Details for planned template0/template1 c... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Details for planned template0/templat... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Details for planned template0/tem... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Details for planned template0... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Details for planned temp... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Details for planned template0/template1 c... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Details for planned template0/templat... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Details for planned template0/tem... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Details for planned template0... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Details for planned temp... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Details for planned ... Philip Warner