Zeugswetter Andreas SB wrote: > > PS: You might consider applying the patch for (update where > not_found) -> 100 > > No, this is not allowed. sqlcode is supposed to be 0 in above case. > You need to explicitly check for the number of rows updated in your > program if needed. > > Andreas According to my reading of the SQL standard this is the only compliant behaviour. Do you know better? Christof
- AW: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] USE OF CURSORS IN EC... Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- Christof Petig