Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Now, J Random slides in the new OS CD on a backup of his main server, > and upgrades. RedHat 7.2's installer is very smart -- if no packages > are left that use glibc 2.0, it doesn't install the compat-libs > necessary for glibc 2.0 apps to run. Actually, glibc is a bad example of things to break - it has versioned symbols, so postgresql is pretty likely to continue working (barring doing extremely low-level stuff, like doing weird things to the loader or depend on buggy behaviour (like Oracle did)). Postgresql doesn't use C++ either (which is a horrible mess wrt. binary compatibility - there is no such thing, FTTB). However, if it depended on kernel specific behaviour (like things in /proc, which may or may not have changed its output format) it could break. -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc.
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs.... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] 7.... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL... Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: l... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: l... Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (wa... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: l... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (wa... Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- [HACKERS] Re:RPM dependencies (Was: 7.0... Lamar Owen