On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Zeugswetter Andreas SB wrote:

> 
> > Well I can re-write and resubmit this patch. Add it as a 
> > compile time option
> > is not bad idea. Second possibility is distribute it as patch 
> > in the contrib
> > tree. And if it until not good tested not dirty with this main tree...
> > 
> >  Ok, I next week prepare it... 
> 
> One thing that worries me though is, that it extends the sql language,
> and there has been no discussion about the chosen syntax.
> 
> Imho the standard embedded SQL syntax (prepare ...) could be a 
> starting point.

 Yes, you are right... my PREPARE/EXECUTE is not too much ready to SQL92,
I some old letter I speculate about "SAVE/EXECUTE PLAN" instead
PREPARE/EXECUTE. But don't forget, it will *experimental* patch... we can 
change it in future ..etc.

                                        Karel

Reply via email to