On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Larry Rosenman wrote: > ler=# select * from ler_test; > net | host > ---------------+------------------ > 207.158.72/24 | 207.158.72.11/24 > (1 row) > > ler=# select host(net::inet) from ler_test; > ERROR: CIDR type has no host part > ERROR: CIDR type has no host part I agree. There should be a coercion function, but it should never be automatic...But since now there aren't any automatic coercions, that's not a problem ;) Also, I agree with Larry that cidr _must_ be printed with 4 octets in them, whether they are 0 or not. (i.e. it should print 207.158.72.0/24) This is the standard way of specifying addresses in all network equipment. RFC specifies that, just the library that we use doesn't (yes, it is from Vixie, but it doesn't make it RFC-compliant) I'll submit patches in a week or so, when I start straightening out my network equipment tables...;) -alex
- [HACKERS] Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Summary: what to do about INET/CI... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Summary: what to do about INE... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Summary: what to do about... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Summary: what to do about INE... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Summary: what to do about... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Summary: what to do ... Alex Pilosov
- Re: [HACKERS] Summary: what to... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Summary: wha... Alex Pilosov
- Re: [HACKERS] Summary: what to... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Summary: wha... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Summary: wha... Alex Pilosov
- Re: [HACKERS] Summary: what to... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Summary: wha... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Summary: wha... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Summary: wha... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Summary: wha... Tom Lane