Tom Lane wrote: > In situations like SQL function calls, it may be necessary to suspend > a table scan while we go off and do other commands, then come back and > resume the table scan. So there can be multiple scans with different > command IDs in progress within a transaction. Ohh yes .. you are right. Thanks for explanation. devik
- [HACKERS] Unneccessary cmax in heap tuple ? devik
- Re: [HACKERS] Unneccessary cmax in heap tuple ? Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] Unneccessary cmax in heap tuple ? devik
- Re: [HACKERS] Unneccessary cmax in heap tuple ? Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] Unneccessary cmax in heap tuple ? Tom Lane
- devik