Pete Forman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've done bit more research. <xti.h> was the correct place to find
> TCP_NODELAY in UNIX98/SUSv2. However in the Austin Group draft of the
> next version of POSIX and UNIX0x/SUSv3, XTI has been dropped and
> <netinet/tcp.h> officially included.
OK, thanks for following up on that.
>> to revert the whole patch and instead make configure's test for
>> availability of <netinet/tcp.h> first include <netinet/in.h>, so
>> that that configure test will succeed on IRIX etc.
> I agree with this. Back out the patch and update configure.in.
Will do.
regards, tom lane
- [HACKERS] Re: Add support for <xti.h> Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Add support for <xti.h> Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Add support for <xti.h> Larry Rosenman
- [HACKERS] Re: Add support for <xti.h> Pete Forman
- [HACKERS] Re: Add support for <xti.h> Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: Add support for <xti.h> Bruce Momjian
- [HACKERS] Re: Add support for <xti.h> Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Add support for <xti.h&... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Add support for <xti.h&... Pete Forman
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Add support for <xt... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Add support for &... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Add support f... Pete Forman
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Add suppo... Peter Eisentraut
- [HACKERS] Re: Add support for <xti.h> Pete Forman
