Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is an opportune time to sort out the use of the make variables > CPPFLAGS and CFLAGS, which are used interchangeably in some places. > Unfortunately, this would mean having to fix each of the targets > dep depend: > $(CC) -MM $(CFLAGS) *.c >depend Why? Shouldn't CFLAGS include CPPFLAGS? These targets seem correct to me as they stand ... other than assuming CC is gcc, but nevermind that... regards, tom lane
- [HACKERS] Coming attractions: VPATH build; make variable... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Coming attractions: VPATH build; make... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Coming attractions: VPATH build; ... Peter Eisentraut
- make depend (Re: [HACKERS] Coming attractions: ... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: make depend (Re: [HACKERS] Coming attra... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: make depend (Re: [HACKERS] Coming attra... Tom Lane
- Re: make depend (Re: [HACKERS] Coming a... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: make depend (Re: [HACKERS] Com... Tom Lane
- Re: make depend (Re: [HACKERS]... Brook Milligan
- Re: make depend (Re: [HACKERS]... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Coming attractions: VPATH build; make... Bruce Momjian