> I'm still nervous about how we're going to test the WAL code > adequately for the lesser-used index types. Any ideas out there? First, seems we'll have to follow to what you've proposed for their redo/undo: log each *fact* of changing a page to know was update op done entirely or not (rebuild index if so). + log information about where to find tuple pointing to heap (for undo). This is much easy to do than logging suitable for recovery. Vadim
