On Sun, 8 Oct 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Are there any platforms that do not have mktemp? Hard to imagine. mktemp(1) or mktemp(3)? The latter is pretty much universal (and dangerous too). The former is, AFAICS, available only on some Linux and BSD. But it's under the BSD licence, and is not a long program. For portability's sake, it may be easier just to include it in the distribution. Matthew.
- Re: [HACKERS] Autoconf version discrepancies Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Autoconf version discrepancies Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Autoconf version discrepancies Vince Vielhaber
- Re: [HACKERS] Autoconf version discrepancies Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Autoconf version discrepancies The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Autoconf version discrepancie... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Autoconf version discrepa... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Autoconf version dis... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Autoconf version... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Autoconf version... Patrick Welche
- Re: [HACKERS] Autoconf version dis... Matthew Kirkwood
- Re: [HACKERS] Autoconf version discrepa... The Hermit Hacker