Re: [HACKERS] loss of portability in ecpg

[Peter Eisentraut]

Tom Lane writes:

> Current ecpg sources will not build on a compiler that doesn't accept
> "long long int".  They are also overly optimistic about the prospects
> of having strtoull() in libc.  I think some autoconf work is needed
> here.

Will look.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut      [EMAIL PROTECTED]       http://yi.org/peter-e/