On 10/2/21 11:05 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: >> It's not like this forces you to use cirrus or anything. For people that >> don't >> want to use CI, It'll make cfbot a bit more effective (because people can >> adjust what it tests as appropriate for $patch), but that's it. > Yeah. I cannot see any reason to object to Andres' 0002 patch: you can > just ignore those files if you don't want to use cirrus.
Yeah. I enable cirrus selectively on my github repos, which makes it close to impossible to get an unwanted effect. One of the things I like about this is that it institutionalizes some knowledge that has hitherto been mostly private. I have a lot of this in a setup I use for spinning up test instances, but this makes a lot of that sort of knowledge more broadly available. I hope it will also encourage people to test more widely, given how easy it will make it. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
