Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: > On 2021-Oct-02, Tom Lane wrote: >> Yeah. I have been thinking of looking through the oldest CF entries >> and proposing that we just reject any that look permanently stalled.
> I was just going to say the same thing yesterday, and reference [1] > when I did it once in 2019. I think it was a useful cleanup exercise. > [1] https://postgr.es/m/20190930182818.GA25331@alvherre.pgsql Right. Michael and Jaime have been doing some of that too in the last few days, but obviously a CFM should only do that unilaterally in very clear-cut cases of patch abandonment. I was intending to go after some where maybe a bit of community consensus is needed for rejection. regards, tom lane
