Jelte Fennema <jelte.fenn...@microsoft.com> writes:
> Personally, I would love to see this backpatched. Since together with a
> second bug I reported[1] it's causing high query timeouts in Citus even if
> tcp_user_timeout is set to a low value. I do understand your worry though.
> Would a patch like the one I attached now be a better fit for a backport?
The only way that could work as-intended is if c.h includes whatever
header provides TCP_USER_TIMEOUT, which does not seem like a great idea.
regards, tom lane
