At Fri, 01 Oct 2021 11:23:33 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota....@gmail.com> wrote in > function but that is apparently too-much complex. (It would be worth > doing if we share the same backbone processing with archive_command, > restore_command, recover_end_command and so on, but that is > necessarily accompanied by the need to change the behavior either > log_line_prefix or others.)
So I was daydreaming over the idea and concluded as it is no-go. I said that the fdw-application name is close to archive_command rather than log_line_prefix, but that is totally missing the point. log_line_prefix and the fdw-application name share the concept of formatting, which is not a part of archive_command and friends. The latter is made very light weight and simple due to not only the formatless-ness but also the narrow choices of escape characters. Also they work on fixed-length buffer instead of StringInfo. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
