Hi,
On 2021-09-30 16:03:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > ... sure enough, 002_types.pl
> > falls over with TZ=Africa/Casablanca on my Linux machine, too.
>
> Independently of whether Africa/Casablanca is a sane translation of
> that Windows zone name, it'd be nice if 002_types.pl weren't so
> sensitive to the prevailing zone. I looked into exactly why it's
> falling over, and the answer seems to be this bit:
> (2, tstzrange('Mon Aug 04 00:00:00 2014 CEST'::timestamptz -
> interval '2 days', 'Mon Aug 04 00:00:00 2014 CEST'::timestamptz), '{"[2,3]",
> "[20,30]"}'),
> (3, tstzrange('Mon Aug 04 00:00:00 2014 CEST'::timestamptz -
> interval '3 days', 'Mon Aug 04 00:00:00 2014 CEST'::timestamptz),
> '{"[3,4]"}'),
> (4, tstzrange('Mon Aug 04 00:00:00 2014 CEST'::timestamptz -
> interval '4 days', 'Mon Aug 04 00:00:00 2014 CEST'::timestamptz), '{"[4,5]",
> NULL, "[40,50]"}'),
>
> The problem with this is the blithe assumption that "minus N days"
> is an immutable computation. It ain't. As bad luck would have it,
> these intervals all manage to cross a Moroccan DST boundary
> (Ramadan, I assume):
For a minute I was confused, because of course we should still get the same
result on the subscriber as on the publisher. But then I re-re-re-realized
that the comparison data is a constant in the test script...
> What I'm inclined to do about that is get rid of the totally-irrelevant-
> to-this-test interval subtractions, and just write the desired timestamps
> as constants.
Sounds like a plan.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
