On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 6:49 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>
> On 2021-Sep-28, Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> > But it is not allowed to create schema or table with the name
> > CURRENT_SCHEMA, so not sure if we need to do anything special for it.
>
> Oh? You certainly can.
>
> alvherre=# create schema "CURRENT_SCHEMA";
> CREATE SCHEMA
> alvherre=# \dn
> Listado de esquemas
> Nombre | Dueño
> ----------------+-------------------
> CURRENT_SCHEMA | alvherre
> public | pg_database_owner
> temp | alvherre
> (3 filas)
>
> alvherre=# create table "CURRENT_SCHEMA"."CURRENT_SCHEMA" ("bother amit for a
> while" int);
> CREATE TABLE
> alvherre=# \d "CURRENT_SCHEMA".*
> Tabla «CURRENT_SCHEMA.CURRENT_SCHEMA»
> Columna | Tipo | Ordenamiento | Nulable | Por omisión
> -------------------------+---------+--------------+---------+-------------
> bother amit for a while | integer | | |
>
oops, I was trying without quotes.
>
> > Now, during post-processing, the PUBLICATIONOBJ_CONTINUATION will be
> > distinguished as CURRENT_SCHEMA because both rangeVar and name will be
> > NULL. Do you have other ideas to deal with it?
>
> That sounds plausible. There's no need for a name-free object of any other
> kind AFAICS, so there should be no conflict. If we ever do find a
> conflict, we can add another struct member to disambiguate.
>
Okay, thanks. I feel now we are in agreement on the grammar rules.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
