On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:24 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 6:21 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 4:23 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Sure, but each tablesync worker must have a separate relid. Why can't
> > > we have a single hash table for both apply and table sync workers
> > > which are hashed by sub_id + rel_id? For apply worker, the rel_id will
> > > always be zero (InvalidOId) and tablesync workers will have a unique
> > > OID for rel_id, so we should be able to uniquely identify each of
> > > apply and table sync workers.
> >
> > What I imagined is to extend the subscription statistics, for
> > instance, transaction stats[1]. By having a hash table for
> > subscriptions, we can store those statistics into an entry of the hash
> > table and we can think of subscription errors as also statistics of
> > the subscription. So we can have another hash table for errors in an
> > entry of the subscription hash table. For example, the subscription
> > entry struct will be something like:
> >
> > typedef struct PgStat_StatSubEntry
> > {
> > Oid subid; /* hash key */
> >
> > HTAB *errors; /* apply and table sync errors */
> >
> > /* transaction stats of subscription */
> > PgStat_Counter xact_commit;
> > PgStat_Counter xact_commit_bytes;
> > PgStat_Counter xact_error;
> > PgStat_Counter xact_error_bytes;
> > PgStat_Counter xact_abort;
> > PgStat_Counter xact_abort_bytes;
> > PgStat_Counter failure_count;
> > } PgStat_StatSubEntry;
> >
>
> I think these additional stats will be displayed via
> pg_stat_subscription, right? If so, the current stats of that view are
> all in-memory and are per LogicalRepWorker which means that for those
> stats also we will have different entries for apply and table sync
> worker. If this understanding is correct, won't it be better to
> represent this as below?
I was thinking that we have a different stats view for example
pg_stat_subscription_xacts that has entries per subscription. But your
idea seems better to me.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
