> On 25 Sep 2021, at 15:45, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> writes: >>> On 25 Sep 2021, at 12:03, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: >>> As 9.6 will be EOL'd in a couple of weeks, is that really >>> worth the effort though? It sounds risky to me to introduce an >>> invasive change as that would increase the risk of bugs for existing >>> users. So my vote would be to just let this one go. > >> Agreed, if it's not a simple fix it's unlikely to be worth it. > > Yeah, there will be no second chance to get 9.6.last right, > so I'd vote against touching it for this.
Fair point. Should we perhaps instead include a note in the pgcrypto docs for 9.6 that 3.0.0 isn't supported and leave it at that? -- Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
