Hi Amit-san, On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:34 PM Amit Langote <amitlangot...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think there's a word missing in the following comment: > > /* > * See if the partition bounds for inputs are exactly the same, in > * which case we don't need to work hard: the join rel have the same > * partition bounds as inputs, and the partitions with the same > * cardinal positions form the pairs. > > ": the join rel have the same..." seems to be missing a "will". > > Attached a patch to fix.
Good catch! Will fix. Thanks! Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
