On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 10:06 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> We had left it as an open issue whether or not to risk back-patching > 5c056b0c2 into stable branches [1]. While updating the v14 release notes, > I realized that we can't put off that decision any longer, because we > have to decide now whether to document that as a new behavior in v14. > > I'm inclined to back-patch, since nobody has complained about this > in 14beta3. Thoughts? > > regards, tom lane > > [1] > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CABNQVagu3bZGqiTjb31a8D5Od3fUMs7Oh3gmZMQZVHZ%3DuWWWfQ%40mail.gmail.com > > > Hi, +1 to backporting. Thanks