Em qua., 15 de set. de 2021 às 01:08, Fujii Masao < masao.fu...@oss.nttdata.com> escreveu:
> > > On 2021/09/11 12:21, Fujii Masao wrote: > > > > > > On 2021/07/23 20:07, Ranier Vilela wrote: > >> Em sex., 23 de jul. de 2021 às 07:02, Aleksander Alekseev < > aleksan...@timescale.com <mailto:aleksan...@timescale.com>> escreveu: > >> > >> Hi hackers, > >> > >> The following review has been posted through the commitfest > application: > >> make installcheck-world: tested, passed > >> Implements feature: tested, passed > >> Spec compliant: tested, passed > >> Documentation: tested, passed > >> > >> The patch was tested on MacOS against master `80ba4bb3`. > >> > >> The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer > >> > >> > >> The second patch seems fine too. I'm attaching both patches to > trigger cfbot and to double-check them. > >> > >> Thanks Aleksander, for reviewing this. > > > > I looked at these patches because they are marked as ready for committer. > > They don't change any actual behavior, but look valid to me in term of > coding. > > Barring any objection, I will commit them. > > > No need to backpatch, why this patch is classified as > > refactoring only. > > I found this in the commit log in the patch. I agree that these patches > are refactoring ones. But I'm thinking that it's worth doing back-patch, > to make future back-patching easy. Thought? > Thanks for picking this. I don't see anything against it being more work for the committer. regards, Ranier Vilela
