On 2021-Sep-06, Amit Kapila wrote: > The error can occur at multiple places (like via palloc or various > other places) between the first time we subtract the change_size and > add it back after the change is re-computed. I think the correct fix > would be that in the beginning we just compute the change_size by > ReorderBufferChangeSize and then after re-computing the change, we > just subtract the old change_size and add the new change_size. What do > you think?
Am I the only that that thinks this code is doing far too much in a PG_CATCH block? -- Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "Those who use electric razors are infidels destined to burn in hell while we drink from rivers of beer, download free vids and mingle with naked well shaved babes." (http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=44793&cid=4647152)
