On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 6:45 AM Euler Taveira <eu...@eulerto.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2021, at 8:02 PM, Bossart, Nathan wrote:
>
> nitpick: It looks like there's an extra set of parentheses around
> errmsg().
>
> Indeed. Even the requirement for extra parenthesis around auxiliary function
> calls was removed in v12 (e3a87b4991cc2d00b7a3082abb54c5f12baedfd1).
The same commit says that the new code can be written in any way.
Having said that, I will leave it to the committer to take a call on
whether or not to remove the extra parenthesis.
"
While new code can be written either way, code intended to be
back-patched will need to use extra parens for awhile yet.
"
Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
