On Thu, Sep 2, 2021, at 00:03, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > I can see value in a function like this one, and the API is AFAICT fairly > aligned with what I as a user would expect it to be given what we already > have.
Good to hear and thanks for looking at this patch. I've fixed the problem due to the recent change in setup_regexp_matches(), which added a new int parameter "start_search". I pass 0 as start_search, which I think should give the same behaviour as before. I also changed the assigned oid values in pg_proc.dat for the two new regexp_positions() catalog functions. $ make check ======================= All 209 tests passed. ======================= /Joel
0005-regexp-positions.patch
Description: Binary data
