On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 10:19:17PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote: > (Sorry about being very late to this thread.) > > > Would it be unreasonable of us to ask for a worked-out example making > > use of the proposed hook? That'd go a long way towards resolving the > > question of whether you can do anything useful without duplicating > > lots of code. > > > > I've also been wondering, given the table-AM projects that are > > going on, whether we shouldn't refactor things to give partitioned > > tables a special access method, and then shove most of the planner > > and executor's hard-wired partitioning logic into access method > > callbacks. That would make it a lot more feasible for extensions > > to implement custom partitioning-like behavior ... or so I guess. > > Interesting proposition... >
Since there is no clear definition here, we seems to be expecting an example of how the hook will be used and there have been no activity since may. I suggest we move this to Returned with feedback. Which I'll do in a couple hours. -- Jaime Casanova Director de Servicios Profesionales SystemGuards - Consultores de PostgreSQL
