On 9/9/21 7:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > We don't actually prevent you from scrolling a NO SCROLL cursor: > > There are probably specific cases where you do get an error, > but we don't have a blanket you-can't-do-that check. Should we?
I would say yes. NO SCROLL means no scrolling; or at least should. On the other hand, if there is no optimization or other meaningful difference between SCROLL and NO SCROLL, then we can just document it as a no-op that is only provided for standard syntax compliance. -- Vik Fearing
