> From Mon, Sep 6, 2021 1:56 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 8:54 PM vignesh C <vignes...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Thanks for the comments, the attached v3 patch has the changes for
> > > the same.
> > >
> >
> > I think this bug should be fixed in back branches (till v10). OTOH, as
> > this is not reported by any user and we have found it during code
> > review so it seems either users don't have an exact use case or they
> > haven't noticed this yet. What do you people think about back-patching?
> 
> Personally, I think it's ok to back-patch.

I found that the patch cannot be applied to back-branches(v10-v14) cleanly,
so, I generate the patches for back-branches. Attached, all the patches have
passed regression test.

Best regards,
Hou zj

Attachment: v5-HEAD-0001-Invalidate-relcache-for-publications-defined-for-.patch
Description: v5-HEAD-0001-Invalidate-relcache-for-publications-defined-for-.patch

Attachment: v5-PG10-0001-Invalidate-relcache-for-publications-defined-for-.patch
Description: v5-PG10-0001-Invalidate-relcache-for-publications-defined-for-.patch

Attachment: v5-PG11-0001-Invalidate-relcache-for-publications-defined-for-.patch
Description: v5-PG11-0001-Invalidate-relcache-for-publications-defined-for-.patch

Attachment: v5-PG12-0001-Invalidate-relcache-for-publications-defined-for-.patch
Description: v5-PG12-0001-Invalidate-relcache-for-publications-defined-for-.patch

Attachment: v5-PG13-0001-Invalidate-relcache-for-publications-defined-for-.patch
Description: v5-PG13-0001-Invalidate-relcache-for-publications-defined-for-.patch

Attachment: v5-PG14-0001-Invalidate-relcache-for-publications-defined-for-.patch
Description: v5-PG14-0001-Invalidate-relcache-for-publications-defined-for-.patch

Reply via email to