> From Mon, Sep 6, 2021 1:56 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 8:54 PM vignesh C <vignes...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thanks for the comments, the attached v3 patch has the changes for > > > the same. > > > > > > > I think this bug should be fixed in back branches (till v10). OTOH, as > > this is not reported by any user and we have found it during code > > review so it seems either users don't have an exact use case or they > > haven't noticed this yet. What do you people think about back-patching? > > Personally, I think it's ok to back-patch.
I found that the patch cannot be applied to back-branches(v10-v14) cleanly, so, I generate the patches for back-branches. Attached, all the patches have passed regression test. Best regards, Hou zj
v5-HEAD-0001-Invalidate-relcache-for-publications-defined-for-.patch
Description: v5-HEAD-0001-Invalidate-relcache-for-publications-defined-for-.patch
v5-PG10-0001-Invalidate-relcache-for-publications-defined-for-.patch
Description: v5-PG10-0001-Invalidate-relcache-for-publications-defined-for-.patch
v5-PG11-0001-Invalidate-relcache-for-publications-defined-for-.patch
Description: v5-PG11-0001-Invalidate-relcache-for-publications-defined-for-.patch
v5-PG12-0001-Invalidate-relcache-for-publications-defined-for-.patch
Description: v5-PG12-0001-Invalidate-relcache-for-publications-defined-for-.patch
v5-PG13-0001-Invalidate-relcache-for-publications-defined-for-.patch
Description: v5-PG13-0001-Invalidate-relcache-for-publications-defined-for-.patch
v5-PG14-0001-Invalidate-relcache-for-publications-defined-for-.patch
Description: v5-PG14-0001-Invalidate-relcache-for-publications-defined-for-.patch