> On 7 Sep 2021, at 14:44, Bharath Rupireddy > <bharath.rupireddyforpostg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems like we use "superuser" as a standard term across the entire > code base i.e. error messages, docs, code comments. But there are > still a few code comments that use the term "super user". Can we > replace those with "superuser"? Attaching a tiny patch to do that. Good catch, superuser is the term we should use for this. There is one additional “super user” in src/test/regress/sql/conversion.sql (and its corresponding resultfile) which can be included in this. Unless there are objections I’ll apply this with the testfile fixup. -- Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
