On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 1:31 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > Yeah. We should try to work toward removing the limits on NAMEDATALEN > for the attribute names. Easier said than done :)
Yes, but even if we eventually fix that my impression is that we would still enforce a limit of 128 characters (or bytes) as this is the SQL specification. So trying to rely on json identifiers having the same rules as SQL identifiers sounds like the wrong approach.
