On 05.09.21 21:57, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@enterprisedb.com> writes:
Makes sense. I think we could do it without hardcoding those library
names, as in the attached patch. But it comes out to the same result
AFAICT.
This has been pushed, but the CF entry is still open, which is
making the cfbot unhappy. Were you leaving it open pending
pushing to back branches as well? I'm not sure what the point
of waiting is --- the buildfarm isn't going to exercise the
troublesome scenario.
I noticed another fix that was required and didn't get to it until now.
It's all done and backpatched now. CF entry is closed.
