On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 1:51 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Do you have any suggestions on how to achieve that without adding some > additional variable? I think it is not a very hard requirement as we > don't follow the same at other places in code. >
Sorry, forget my suggestion, I see it's not easy to achieve it and still execute the non-error-case code after the switch. (you'd have to use a variable set in the default case, defeating the purpose, or have the switch in a separate function with return for each case) So the 0001 patch LGTM. Regards, Greg Nancarrow Fujitsu Australia