On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 1:06 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > You have a point but if we see the below logs, it seems the second > walsender (#step6) seemed to exited before the first walsender > (#step4). > > 2021-08-15 18:44:38.041 CEST [16475:10] tap_sub LOG: disconnection: > session time: 0:00:00.036 user=nm database=postgres host=[local] > 2021-08-15 18:44:38.043 CEST [16336:14] tap_sub LOG: disconnection: > session time: 0:00:06.367 user=nm database=postgres host=[local] > > Isn't it possible that pid is cleared in the other order due to which > we are seeing this problem? If the pid is cleared in the other order, wouldn't the query [1] return a false? [1] - " SELECT pid != 16336 FROM pg_stat_replication WHERE application_name = 'tap_sub';" regards, Ajin Cherian Fujitsu Australia
