On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 4:15 AM 蔡梦娟(玊于) <mengjuan....@alibaba-inc.com> wrote: > I want to know why the interrupt is only handled when ProcDiePending is true, > I think query which is supposed to be canceled also should respond to the > signal.
Well, if we're halfway through sending a message to the client and we abort the write, we have no way of re-establishing protocol sync, right? It's OK to die without sending any more data to the client, since then the connection is closed anyway and the loss of sync doesn't matter, but continuing the session doesn't seem workable. Your proposed patch actually seems to dodge this problem and I think perhaps we could consider something along those lines. It would be interesting to hear what Andres thinks about this idea, since I think he was the last one to rewrite that code. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
